| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| lemonade kid |
Posted - 10/09/2011 : 21:59:33
I have seen many old, or classic, DOORS LPs etc that have been signed more recently by the surviving members--long after a leader had passed.
Do you feel that a "sig" by Ray or Robbie or John devalues a really rare artifact such as a MONO first pressing LP of The DOORS s/t--getting something signed at a more recent concert or promo appearance?
The only Love item that I feel certainly increased in value with a later sig was by the MAN himself in the 80's...Arthur signed my Da Capo CD. Michael too, but that is sentimental for me.
I have read posts here by some who wished they had never had a band member, and such, sign their treasured collectables.
Personally, I have wondered about getting Michael Stuart-Ware to sign my first press vinyl Forever Changes. As Michael is a friend, it would make it special in some ways for me...but I don't know....what do you think, Torben...valued members?
Maybe the few surviving members of the original Love (only Johnny Echols & Michael...geese, sorry I forgot Snoopy) would be more special & add value, as they aren't out there still "selling their souls" for money.
What are your thoughts, forum collectors?
 |
| 2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| underture |
Posted - 12/09/2011 : 13:51:22
I don't have any vintage LoVE material, but if I did I would not hesitate for a moment to have Johnny, Michael or even Snoopy sign. I would never give these items up and after I pass I don't think I'll care what happens to them.
You Set The Scene |
| John9 |
Posted - 10/09/2011 : 23:03:23
These must be wonderful to have, LK. The only autogaphs I have are those from a handful of authors. To my mind, they definitely add to the meaning and enjoyment of whatever it is, be it record or book.  |
|
|
