| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| ZFarrar |
Posted - 15/04/2006 : 00:37:09
I found the interviews on http://www.indie44.com/love/links.html
Holy crap, these may do more dammage than good. Arthur unfortunately
in the various interviews trashes everyone including Mick Jagger, Brian Wilson, Paul McCartney and nearly every past member of Love.
I can't believe what he said to Jack White. It's almost funny, but its really sad. But the strangest interview is one where he plans to reunite with the 1965-1968 band. I believe this must have been in the late 80's, too bad it didn't happen. |
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| ZFarrar |
Posted - 21/04/2006 : 17:47:44
Neil Young was too busy not showing up for Buffalo Springfield gigs at that time. |
| waxburn |
Posted - 21/04/2006 : 05:39:02
quote:
Originally posted by kdion11
quote:
Originally posted by waxburn
I know of such an interview from the posts here, and it is on a
dvd.[:), from the early 90s. I don't have the dvd, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.
Then there is the engineer from MCA whose comments are on
the web site.
Once again folks, "coulda woulda shoulda" . The engineer from MCA
is full of **** and that post should be taken down. It is not based
on logic, nor corresponds to any known facts taken from anyone who was present. Give me a break PLEASE ! Like Jimi would have recorded the tracks but Arthur chose to have one of his "new" guitarists "ape"
them and leave Jimi's tracks down in the mix. Yea right.
The logic sort of goes like this folks: "I know, I'll get the greatest guitarist ever known to record tracks for my new album,
but we won't actually use them. We'll get the new guy in hear to try
and replicate them instead !"
I've spoken to Arthur myself on this point and he refutes it. But oh, no, Waxie has a "gut feeling" on this, so he must be right, and Jazzman, myself and everyone else must be wrong !
I rest my case - but Waxie just won't leave it alone.
I just don't think it would be nice to take that post down. He is
the only one who actually listened to the tracks.
There may be many reasons why the tracks, if they exist, have not been released. I may be wrong, the key word being 'may'. I just like to form my own opinions My apologies to the historians. |
| kdion11 |
Posted - 20/04/2006 : 20:28:48
quote:
Originally posted by waxburn
I know of such an interview from the posts here, and it is on a
dvd.[:), from the early 90s. I don't have the dvd, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.
Then there is the engineer from MCA whose comments are on
the web site.
Once again folks, "coulda woulda shoulda" . The engineer from MCA
is full of **** and that post should be taken down. It is not based
on logic, nor corresponds to any known facts taken from anyone who was present. Give me a break PLEASE ! Like Jimi would have recorded the tracks but Arthur chose to have one of his "new" guitarists "ape"
them and leave Jimi's tracks down in the mix. Yea right.
The logic sort of goes like this folks: "I know, I'll get the greatest guitarist ever known to record tracks for my new album,
but we won't actually use them. We'll get the new guy in hear to try
and replicate them instead !"
I've spoken to Arthur myself on this point and he refutes it. But oh, no, Waxie has a "gut feeling" on this, so he must be right, and Jazzman, myself and everyone else must be wrong !
I rest my case - but Waxie just won't leave it alone. |
| waxburn |
Posted - 20/04/2006 : 14:25:19
quote:
Originally posted by jazmaan
quote:
Originally posted by waxburn
quote:
Originally posted by jazmaan
No he hasn't. He's never claimed that more than three songs were recorded.
Isnt there an interview where he said there was 15 hours?
It's not helpful to ask loaded questions. If you know of such an interview, then please post a link or a verbatim transcript.
I know of such an interview from the posts here, and it is on a
dvd.[:), from the early 90s. I don't have the dvd, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.
Then there is the engineer from MCA whose comments are on
the web site. |
| jazmaan |
Posted - 20/04/2006 : 02:55:18
quote:
Originally posted by waxburn
quote:
Originally posted by jazmaan
No he hasn't. He's never claimed that more than three songs were recorded.
Isnt there an interview where he said there was 15 hours?
It's not helpful to ask loaded questions. If you know of such an interview, then please post a link or a verbatim transcript. |
| waxburn |
Posted - 19/04/2006 : 02:36:21
quote:
Originally posted by kdion11
quote:
Originally posted by waxburn
quote:
Originally posted by astrolobe33
quote:
Originally posted by kdion11
KD: Here we go again folks
NNNOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooo!!!!
I don't see why they keep on blaming me for what Arthur said!
Maybe because you're a moron ?
Free the tags ! 
Arthur didn't say there were 15 hrs |
| kdion11 |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 21:44:21
quote:
Originally posted by waxburn
quote:
Originally posted by astrolobe33
quote:
Originally posted by kdion11
KD: Here we go again folks
NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooo!!!!
I don't see why they keep on blaming me for what Arthur said!
Maybe because you're a moron ?
Free the tags ! |
| kdion11 |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 21:38:45
quote:
Originally posted by BobbyFischer
I bought shakey an neil young biography - In a footnote to this cite:"Arthur Lee told me((Jimmy Mcdonough-the author))Neil might have something to do with "daily planet.""nope,"said Young.
KD: There you have it folks, straight from the horse's mouth
about Neil's "alledgedly going to produce Forever Changes".
Yea right. So much for certain people "re-writing history".
Free the truth ! |
| waxburn |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 21:01:51
quote:
Originally posted by astrolobe33
quote:
Originally posted by kdion11
KD: Here we go again folks
NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooo!!!!
I don't see why they keep on blaming me for what Arthur said! |
| BobbyFischer |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 21:00:33
I bought shakey an neil young biography yesterday and he has some interesting view on Love:"Love-they were cool.pretty "out there".They were just bad enough and ****ed up enough to make fun of-but they were so good,too.They were just off-the-wall--They weren`t really respected for what they were doing by other musicians.But Love was a great band--When you look back on it,they were really awesome."Orange skies"."I just got out my little red book..."Those ****in`songs,what the hell is that?Great stuff."In a footnote to this cite:"Arthur Lee told me((Jimmy Mcdonough-the author))Neil might have something to do with "daily planet.""nope,"said Young. |
| astrolobe33 |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 20:53:20
quote:
Originally posted by kdion11
KD: Here we go again folks
NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooo!!!! |
| kdion11 |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 20:21:54
quote:
Originally posted by waxburn
quote:
Originally posted by jazmaan
No he hasn't. He's never claimed that more than three songs were recorded.
Isnt there an interview where he said there was 15 hours?
KD: Here we go again folks, more funny faces, more inane posts.
Hey Jazzman ! Welcome to our nightmare !
Free the faces ! |
| waxburn |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 04:26:12
quote:
Originally posted by jazmaan
No he hasn't. He's never claimed that more than three songs were recorded.
Isnt there an interview where he said there was 15 hours? |
| jazmaan |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 02:51:21
No he hasn't. He's never claimed that more than three songs were recorded. |
| waxburn |
Posted - 18/04/2006 : 00:55:52
quote:
Originally posted by jazmaan
Note what he says about the Hendrix session. "Everlasting First", "Easy Rider" and a long jam. Exactly what Remi Kabaka told me.
Arthur has been all over the place on this subject. |
